teacup-on-rockingchair

> @anivan-suse @teacup-on-rockingchair FYI Thanks @marcusburghardt. I opened an issue #9115 that will try to handle ASAP

> Hi @teacup-on-rockingchair , do you have plans to work on it soon? The #9104 is blocked by this issue. Hi, my plans are to close this by the end...

My current status check of pam_faillock based rules for SLE platforms showed two main things: - Last service pack for the SLE15 platform supports out of box pam_faillock so those...

> @teacup-on-rockingchair , could you resolve the conflict in this PR, please? Hi @marcusburghardt any issues with the PR that disturbs you?

> /packit test Hi @marcusburghardt I cannot seem to understand how the changes made have connection to the failing tests, that are preventing the PR for merging can you give...

> I couldn't reproduce errors in check mode even before the changes. Some changes are interesting in this PR, but I believe most of the changes are not necessary since...

> Great. Now it is only necessary to update the references for stability tests and the required tests should pass. Thanks @marcusburghardt :bow: I think the only issue in tests...

> @teacup-on-rockingchair could you check the failing test results? The problem with the failing SLE tests for 'file_groupownership_home_directories', 'accounts_users_home_files_groupownership' is the fact that `chgrp` there is called to change the...

> > LGTM, maybe you can use the occasion to minimize the duplication as much as possible, say doing something like : > > ``` > > #!/bin/sh > >...

> /packit retest-failed LGTM 🙇