TG2-AMENDMENT_ESTABLISHMENTMEANS_STANDARDIZED

[ArthurChapman]

TestField	Value
GUID	15d15927-7a22-43f8-88d6-298f5eb45c4c
Label	AMENDMENT_ESTABLISHMENTMEANS_STANDARDIZED
Description	Proposes an amendment to the value of dwc:establishmentMeans using the bdq:sourceAuthority.
TestType	Amendment
Darwin Core Class	dwc:Occurrence
Information Elements ActedUpon	dwc:establishmentMeans
Information Elements Consulted
Expected Response	EXTERNAL_PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if the bdq:sourceAuthority is not available; INTERNAL PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET if dwc:establishmentMeans is bdq:Empty; AMENDED the value of dwc:establishmentMeans if it can be unambiguously matched to a term in the bdq:sourceAuthority; otherwise NOT_AMENDED
Data Quality Dimension	Conformance
Term-Actions	ESTABLISHMENTMEANS_STANDARDIZED
Parameter(s)	bdq:sourceAuthority
Source Authority	bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}
Specification Last Updated	2024-02-08
Examples	[dwc:establishmentMeans="vag.": Response.status=AMENDED, Response.result=dwc:establishmentMeans="vagrant", Response.comment="dwc:establishmentMeans contains an interpretable value in the bdq:sourceAuthority"]
	[dwc:establishmentMeans="cultivated": Response.status=NOT_AMENDED, Response.result="", Response.comment="dwc:establishmentMeans is not an interpretable value in the bdq:sourceAuthority"]
Source	TG2
References	Darwin Core Maintenance Group (2021) Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/doc/em/ Groom et al. (2019) Improving Darwin Core for research and management of alien species. Biodiversity Information Science and Services 3: e38084. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.38084
Example Implementations (Mechanisms)
Link to Specification Source Code
Notes

[tucotuco]

The Notes are in error. "Unknown" is not a valid value for the vocabulary. The corresponding standard controlled value "uncertain " and the preferred label "uncertain (unknown, cryptogenic)". See https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/.

[ArthurChapman]

Like #268, maybe this should also be regarded as CORE now that there is a suitable Vocabulary. Again it received a rating of 6.5.

[ArthurChapman]

Thanks @tucotuco - correct. I was misreading and going by memory. I've deleted the Note.

[chicoreus]

@ArthurChapman I would concur, it makes good sense to include in core, some of the data quality needs elicited by TG3 do involve invasive species and the movement of species, so with vocabularies these tests do feel in scope for core.

[Tasilee]

I've removed the Note as we seem to agree this is now CORE.

[ArthurChapman]

The four tests (#277, #278, #268, #269) should be CORE (I have discussed this with Lee). Some reasons are

• Invasive species are subject of the Convention on Biological Diversity Article 8(h) (https://www.cbd.int/idb/2009/about/cbd) and with a strong use case in the Cop 6 Decision last year VI/23 (https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7197)
• These terms are recent additions to Darwin Core and are aspirational (we want all adding data follow the Standard)
• There are good, well thought out vocabularies and APIs available
• Apart from the CBD Use Case, there are good Use Case arguments given in Groom et al. (reference above)
• There is no reason under our current criteria for excluding these tests from CORE

[chicoreus]

We should be using the following value for the source authority:

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/]}

See: https://github.com/tdwg/bdq/issues/268#issuecomment-1961631041

[Tasilee]

Thanks @chicoreus - Changing Source Authority from

[bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Darwin Core establishmentMeans" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/list/#dwc_establishmentMeans]} {dwc:establishmentMeans vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

to

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/]}

[tucotuco]

I think https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts is OK as a source authority because it actually has an API, as long as it is understood that the actually vocabulary is maintained at https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/ and the GBIF API is expected to remain up to date with that.

[Tasilee]

https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts added back in. Dunno why it was changed back.

[Tasilee]

Changed Source Authority from

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

to

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF EstablishmentMeans Vocabulary" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans]} {"dwc:establishmentMeans vocabulary API" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

[tucotuco]

Source Authority should be

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

[Tasilee]

Changed Source Authority from

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "GBIF EstablishmentMeans Vocabulary" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans]} {"dwc:establishmentMeans vocabulary API" [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

to

bdq:sourceAuthority default = "Establishment Means Controlled Vocabulary List of Terms" {[https://dwc.tdwg.org/em/]} {GBIF vocabulary API [https://api.gbif.org/v1/vocabularies/EstablishmentMeans/concepts]}

[chicoreus]

The first example should be corrected to match the controlled vocabulary, and a disamiguation case that can be resolved from the controlled vocabulary, thus "Native" instead of "native" and "Native (Indigenous)" instead of "indigenous":

[dwc:establishmentMeans="Native (Indigenous)": Response.status=AMENDED, Response.result=dwc:establishmentMeans="Native", Response.comment="dwc:establishmentMeans contains an interpretable value according to the bdq:sourceAuthority"]

[chicoreus]

Looking harder, this is actually a problem with the GBIF controlled vocabulary, it differs from the the TDWG vocabulary in case. The correct value is "native", not "Native". Implementors will have to be aware that the expected value needs to be an exact match to the TDWG vocabulary. This applies to several tests.

[dwc:establishmentMeans="Native (Indigenous)": Response.status=AMENDED, Response.result=dwc:establishmentMeans="native", Response.comment="dwc:establishmentMeans contains an interpretable value according to the bdq:sourceAuthority"]

[tucotuco]

Since a ratified controlled vocabulary actually exists, we should urge GBIF to amend their implementation of the vocabulary.

[chicoreus]

See https://github.com/tdwg/bdq/issues/275#issuecomment-2061845648

The GBIF API is only of partial help here, it does not provide the actual Controlled Values from the TDWG vocabulary, the values it has differ in case, implementations can use the GBIF API for its additional values, but need to align the case to match the actual Controlled Value from the TDWG vocabulary for the dwc: term values (GBIF API is sufficient for the dwciri term values).

[chicoreus]

@tucotuco I agree.

[Tasilee]

GBIF vocabulary has now been aligned with Darwin Core. Thanks @timrobertson100