Tianchu Zhao

could this https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/issues/10364 be a sufficient solution to this proposal?

> Thank you for your reply. I would like to confirm a question. Do you think it is reasonable to pass the retry parameter through the spec? This will increase...

There's an issue with the current approach, Original synchronization(parallelism): - after block by mutex, it doesn't store any item in `wfQueue`, only enqueue `wfQueue` after mutex is release, doesn't waste...

Updated with new approach, ready for review

> Was it a significant uptick in CPU? If it follows `DEFAULT_REQUEUE_TIME`, it should take 10s between each, so I wouldn't think that would be significant In the original approach,...

> @tczhao do u think this patch will work on 3.4.x line? Hi @tooptoop4 , this should work on 3.4 without issue

> @tczhao Would you like to pick this up? Sure :)

> There are also other good UI/UX related issues if you want to help: https://github.com/orgs/argoproj/projects/29 Looks good, thanks for the link

hi @sunyeongchoi , could you fix the DCO signature

> > hi @sunyeongchoi , could you fix the DCO signature > > This still needs more work in any case, per above review. > > Also per my [last...