agendas Add note about normative changes & deadline

See discussion in https://github.com/tc39/process-document/pull/32#issuecomment-949823455

This takes a "must" approach with PRs requiring consensus. If the outcome of the discussion is that PRs should be relaxed to a "should", I can revise this.

Oct 22 '21 22:10 ptomato

Converting to draft, pending plenary consensus.

Oct 23 '21 05:10 ljharb

I've added this to the January agenda: https://github.com/tc39/agendas/pull/1104

Jan 13 '22 20:01 ptomato

I've added some language clarifying that the committee is expected to be more lenient with deadline exceptions for normative changes than for proposal stage advancements, to reflect what we talked about in the meeting. Let me know what you think!

cc @ljharb @erights @codehag @leobalter @syg

Jan 24 '22 23:01 ptomato

I rearranged the first bullet point as per @codehag's last suggestion, I think all the comments have been addressed now! Feel free to take a look.

Feb 08 '22 01:02 ptomato

looks good still; i think this needs a few more reviews before landing tho, just in case :-)

Feb 09 '22 23:02 ljharb

This dropped off my radar, as I actually thought it had already been merged. Could I get a few more reviews please?

Feb 13 '23 21:02 ptomato