Tobias Bleckert
Tobias Bleckert
@aaroncawte Ah, hm. Sounds like a good idea. Thanks for the feedback!
Hi and sorry for slow answer, I'm partly having a summer break. It's not currently possible but it sounds like a really good idea. I think a new property like...
@anavgagneja Yes, that would work but we wouldn't be able to control it in a different manner from the rest of the options. I think the best solution for this...
@DDushkin I haven't had much free time lately but this is a feature that is planned to be added. Hopefully sooner than later. Thanks for showing interest in the feature
Thanks for the report @tada-s . It's a good workaround but would also need to exist inside the debounced promise. A more robust solution would be to move the `setOptions`...
Thanks for the report, will fix asap!
Thanks! As you said, this is a bug, or rather a design flaw. Need to add support for fully controllable values. Right now the internal value is always updated. Workaround...
Hi! Could you link the related issue here or describe it in more detail?
Sorry for the late reply @Ronny25 . Yes, seems like something has broken with the controllable state. I'll take a look
@Vovan-VE Very good, thanks for the report. Will look into it.