tazend

Hi, As far as I am aware, the pyslurm project here does not officially provide any RPMs to install pyslurm (maybe in the future?). Therefore, I am not sure why...

I'll close this issue for now, since there isn't any `python3-pyslurm` RPM provided at least from our side that is listed as required dependency for slurm-web in the spec file...

Hi @JonaOtto For the Job API, I'm currently working in #224 to rework the whole API structure a bit, to support more features and to hopefully make it easier to...

Hi @giovtorres , I think I'm making some good progress with the job class(es) (job-submission, retrieval, etc..). Would it be possible to maybe create a seperate branch for this refactoring...

I will continue to work on this again now. Haven't done anything on this in a while, however last time I already got pretty far with the rework (except a...

Made a [new branch here](https://github.com/PySlurm/pyslurm/tree/rework/jobs) with current progress.

Pretty much 90% of the general functionality is now implemented/reworked, though it will still need some bug-fixing probably, polish and fixing some outstanding TODO's. And need to write tests for...

Hi @giovtorres , very interesting and thanks for the links! Now, my idea is the following: The slurm.pxd file should stay as it is right now, having all the slurm...

You are right that overusing the dict type for returns is not the best, and I agree to your points, since so many things like `Job`, `Node`, `Partition`, `Reservation` ...and...

Hi, I put some more work into the `Partition` class [here](https://github.com/tazend/pyslurm/blob/refactor/pyslurm/partition.pyx) as a first example (+ some [helper functions](https://github.com/tazend/pyslurm/blob/refactor/pyslurm/common.pyx)). This basically implements full functionality for partitions, e.g. updating every attribute...