Tatu Saloranta

(removed this comment when I realized that you already mentioned odd failures in the description)

@ivansenic Looks like errorprone setup is removed currently as well? Having tried my best to upgrade version, as well as try to make it work with other JDKs (without toolchains)...

@ivansenic My assumption was that it was for CDC only (based on label) -- if this is more generally applicable, sure, can re-open and just remove the label. At the...

So, renaming as suggested (current `master` renamed as `v1`; current `v2.0.0` renamed as `main`) is what we plan to do. This will require local changes to Stargate project, as well...

I added a separate google doc with details; unfortunately this requires changes to non-OSS parts as well so can't link from this issue.

Progress so far: * `main` points to Stargate v2 (former `v2.0.0`) * `v1` points to Stargate v1 (former `master`) Yet to do: * Change default branch to be `main` --...

Change the default branch to be `main`, task completed.

@olim7t Is there reason not to use `StargateBridgeClient`? Or put another way, what is the tradeoff here?

I guess it's the question of how much work is done by `StargateBridgeClient` in helping with retries, caching, processing (if any) of bridge datatypes. So if there is no value...

Ok. Well, I agree that we do not want to have extra layers that provide no or very little value. I think I will first try smaller change to get...