Jonas Bernoulli

@vermiculus I prefer to have such discussions on github instead of gitter. From gitter: > Sean Allred @vermiculus 15:30 > @tarsius what's the feasibility of, when building the magit-status buffer,...

Git respects that variable but never sets it. A few Magit commands offer to set it unless configured otherwise.

I am not sure what you are asking for, so I have to be quite explicit. In order to open a pull request you have to tell github about two...

Finding "more issue content" might or might not work. Automatically expanding sections to make matches visible most certainly does not work. But if I understand correctly this is only about...

> Is the section movement framework something you're planning to change or would you be open to a PR? Eventually yes. I plan to use Eieio for sections, but hope...

I also find it very plausible that the overlays are to be blamed.

I wanted to experiment a bit with this myself and get back to you after that. But I am busy with the numerous requests concerning my own packages that keep...

> Do you recall hitting a threshold like this with magit-log? No. > I didn't find concatenating the string before insertion to be effective on my end I would expect...

Magit already has such a cache, but because `ghub` uses `process-line` instead of `magit-get` that isn't being used. Maybe `ghub--host` should use `magit-get` if available, but after optimizing everything else,...

> I feel like we should still cache ghub--host. @tarsius -- would you be open to a PR setting up something basic without adding a hard dependency on magit? Please...