Tarek Elsayed

> change the name `init` to `__constructor` Just to make sure I understand this correctly, If we just rename `init` to `__constructor`, it seems we still wouldn’t fully support constructors...

Alright, here’s what I understand about the desired behavior: - If the developer doesn’t implement `__constructor`, we should export a function called `__constructor` that only initializes storage variables by calling...

Thanks for mentioning `wasm2wat`—it really helps with debugging. > U see that the constructor is named `unnamed` and it contains some logic for doing the print in Soroban. U see...

Hello @JayWhite2357 I’d be happy to take on this issue. I think it could be broken down into multiple PRs for smaller, easier-to-test patches. Let me know if that works...

It’s a bit tricky to break the issue into clear pieces right now. I think it’ll become clearer once we begin the actual implementation. I can start with a small...

> I believe this issue is targeted for internal resolution, thanks for the interest everyone That’s fine, but just to clarify, it was listed as a bounty, and I’ve already...

> Can the two of you coordinate this. Sure I just rebased the branch on top of main. A lot of code has been added since October when I last...