Taras Mankovski
Taras Mankovski
Here is a branch with a failing case for this use case [tm/initializing-nested-node](https://github.com/microstates/microstates.js/tree/tm/initializing-nested-node)
Hi @kmckee, We don't currently have a *microstaty* way of working with asynchrony. For now, we recommend keeping your types pure - meaning without side effects. To use asynchrony with...
I made an example CodeSandbox for you with React https://codesandbox.io/s/r1mvjl4qwq It uses an Async Higher Order Type. It accepts a type and returns a Microstate type for managing async functionality....
@cowboyd I will update my example to use async await.
I will test it but I believe there were some weird edge cases. Should we make `typeOf` that does `microstate.constructor.Type`?
How do we do that?
That’s a great idea. I like this very much.
@eandy5000 can we talk about using ObservableHQ for our demos instead of CodeSandbox? I think we could move the entire README to one ObservableHQ document. I created one to show...
Take a look at it. We can pair on it to see what it would look like if we had our readme in there.
Can we try to combine the runnable code and the code blocks to see what that would look like?