Tal Gluck
Tal Gluck
Varying pieces of this have been implemented by the recent ID/PK work that we've done, as well as in the `include_unexpected_rows` feature, so I'm going to close this for now,...
Resolved by #6660
Closing as this has since been resolved - see here: https://legacy.docs.greatexpectations.io/en/latest/
Hi @milosz-dm - thanks again for raising. As mentioned above, the `validator.validate()` workflow is not preferred, and so we recommend using Checkpoints to validate your data. We still don't yet...
Hi all - thanks again for raising this and for your feedback! Realistically, this isn't something that we will be able to implement in the near-term especially since it sounds...
Hi @derek-hk and others - thanks for raising this! This is great feedback. As mentioned above, this isn't something that we will be able to implement in the near-term, but...
Thanks again for raising! Closing, since this appears to be linked to V2, as mentioned above.
Hi @carlsonp - as mentioned above, we don't have plans to add support for Denodo in the short-term, so I'm going to close this issue for now, though we have...
Hi @kantegajorgen - we're not going to be able to prioritize this in the immediate future, so I'm going to close this for now. That said, we have logged the...