tailwindcss
tailwindcss copied to clipboard
Update lightningcss-darwin-arm64 1.26.0 → 1.28.2 (minor)
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ lightningcss-darwin-arm64 (1.26.0 → 1.28.2) · Repo
Release Notes
1.28.2
Fixes
- Fix duplicate prefixed properties in
transition-property– #850 (thanks @RobinMalfait and @LeoniePhiline!)- Fix mapping original name from source maps – 78f2fc4
- Bump browser compat data – 4159bc5
- Ensure consistent order of custom properties when
allproperty is set – d4eec35
1.28.0
Added
- Add option to avoid hashing
@containernames in CSS Modules by @kdy1 in #835- Improve error message of
input:placeholderby @kdy1 in #813- Add an error for the deprecated
@valueat-rule of CSS Modules by @kdy1 in #842Fixed
- Don't panic when passing system-color to color-mix by @inottn in #819
- Dependency updates by @kornelski in #814
- Fix order of fallback width, height, and other size related properties – 22a8b6f
- Fix stack overflow parsing
calcexpression – e3c8e12- Fix crash when parsing an invalid
calcexpression – 378955e- Skip
clampfunction reduction when the comparison between preferred and max value is unknown – ddc9ce8- Update browser compatibility data – f6b033f
- docs: Update help command docs by @DylanPiercey in #812
- docs: fix link to visitor type definitions by @mayank99 in #823
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 32 commits:
v1.28.2Ensure consistent order of custom properties with all propertyBump browser compat dataFix duplicate `-webkit-backdrop-filter` output (#850)Fix mapping original name from source mapsFix cargo versionsv1.28.0Update browser compat dataUpdate TS definitionschore: update help command docs (#812)fix(css-modules): Do not transform the container name in CSS Modules (#835)feat: Add an error for the deprecated `@value` at-rule of CSS Modules (#842)Only reduce clamp if comparison between center and max is knownFix crash in invalid calcFix stack overflows in calcFlush size properties when we hit an unparsed valueDependency updates (#814)feat: Improve error message of `input:placeholder` (#813)fix: should not panic when passing system-color to color-mix (#819)docs: fix link to visitor type definitions (#823)Update TS definitionsv1.27.0Update browser compat dataFix another copyrightUpdate copyright year on main page (#790)Make CLI example work with windows (update docs.md) (#726)update broken selectors link (#750)Add missing browserslist import in docs.md (#798)fix: fix `box-shadow` combination of `oklch` and `currentColor` (#801)feat: Implement pure mode lints for CSS Modules (#796)feat: Improve error message for pseudo elements followed by selectors (#797)feat: Add content-hash css module name pattern (#802)
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.
All Depfu comment commands
- @depfu rebase
- Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
- @depfu recreate
- Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
- @depfu merge
- Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
- @depfu cancel merge
- Cancels automatic merging of this PR
- @depfu close
- Closes this PR and deletes the branch
- @depfu reopen
- Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
- @depfu pause
- Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
- @depfu pause [minor|major]
- Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
- @depfu resume
- Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)
Sorry, but the merge failed with:
At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.
Sorry, but the merge failed with:
At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.
Sorry, but the merge failed with:
At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access.