feat(protocol): alpha-4 with staking-based tokenomics

[dantaik]

Initial implementation of a token-staking based tokenomics.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #14065 (42bbc5f) into main (d5ca9c1) will increase coverage by 16.85%. Report is 70 commits behind head on main. The diff coverage is 36.32%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14065       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   50.89%   67.75%   +16.85%     
===========================================
  Files         153       88       -65     
  Lines        3973     3045      -928     
  Branches      336      112      -224     
===========================================
+ Hits         2022     2063       +41     
+ Misses       1840      859      -981     
- Partials      111      123       +12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bridge-ui	94.25% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
eventindexer	51.71% <35.71%> (-9.36%)	:arrow_down:
protocol	?
relayer	59.13% <ø> (ø)
ui	?

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
packages/bridge-ui/src/token/tokens.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...exer/http/get_assigned_blocks_by_prover_address.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/eventindexer/http/get_current_provers.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/eventindexer/http/user_added_liquidity.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/eventindexer/http/get_pos_stats.go	26.31% <26.31%> (ø)
packages/eventindexer/repo/event.go	57.57% <41.86%> (-7.60%)	:arrow_down:
packages/eventindexer/http/get_stats.go	66.66% <62.50%> (+4.16%)	:arrow_up:
packages/eventindexer/http/get_unique_proposers.go	71.42% <62.50%> (-1.30%)	:arrow_down:
packages/eventindexer/http/get_unique_provers.go	71.42% <62.50%> (-1.30%)	:arrow_down:
packages/eventindexer/http/server.go	91.11% <81.25%> (-5.00%)	:arrow_down:
... and 2 more

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[dantaik]

I have some questions about this PR, and I may omit some of the logic though.

I'm ok to have a chat, @hugo-blue .

[hugo-blue]

I have some questions about this PR, and I may omit some of the logic though.

I'm ok to have a chat, @hugo-blue .

Sure, let's have a chat tomorrow.

[dantaik]

@Brechtpd @cyberhorsey @davidtaikocha @adaki2004 This branch is ready to be reviewed again and merge to the main branch.

[dantaik]

• [ ] @jscriptcoder bridge UI build failed (https://github.com/taikoxyz/taiko-mono/actions/runs/5686335443), could you please fix it? or we should just ignore it.
• [ ] @jscriptcoder Also I disabled the check here for both bridge-ui and bridge-ui-v2. But ideally they should be uncommented and pass - https://github.com/taikoxyz/taiko-mono/blob/fc22d37be9bd8d740f788c62453cd08817d6fe4d/lefthook.yml#L6
• [ ] @cyberhorsey It seems golint has been deprecated, do you want to fix it? https://github.com/taikoxyz/taiko-mono/actions/runs/5686305487/job/15412856653

[cyberhorsey]

yeah we will switch to revive soon when i get a minute, golint still works for the time being. dosent need to be done in this PR imo, already large and the linting will be different so it can be its own PR. but lets not ignore the bridge-ui failed building.

[dantaik]

@Brechtpd @davidtaikocha @adaki2004 could you please approve this PR again for merging before too many changes on the main branch?

[cyberhorsey]

@Brechtpd @davidtaikocha @adaki2004 could you please approve this PR again for merging before too many changes on the main branch?

I can approve, but should the protocol build pass first? Also seems a bunch of warnings that the new vaults exceed max solidity contract size?

[adaki2004]

@Brechtpd @davidtaikocha @adaki2004 could you please approve this PR again for merging before too many changes on the main branch?

I can approve, but should the protocol build pass first? Also seems a bunch of warnings that the new vaults exceed max solidity contract size?

I'd wait also, there is a fix for the failing test on a separate branch (with rearranging the 2 release (ETH+token) TXN into 1), tho i do not see any code size exceeded issues.

Update: yeah, forge build does not throw them - with hardhat compile i see it, will address on the same branch i mentioned.