taiga-ui
taiga-ui copied to clipboard
feat(addon-doc): support target property for links
Pull request was closed :heavy_check_mark:
All saved screenshots (for current PR) were deleted :wastebasket:
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
v3.x@f8607a1
). Click here to learn what that means.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v3.x #6876 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 60.58%
=======================================
Files ? 90
Lines ? 987
Branches ? 103
=======================================
Hits ? 598
Misses ? 370
Partials ? 19
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
addon-charts | ∅ <ø> (?) |
|
addon-doc | 60.58% <ø> (?) |
|
summary | 60.58% <ø> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit cb752fc):
https://taiga-ui--pr6876-splincode-fix-doc-5f1tcyne.web.app
(expires Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:02:22 GMT)
🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎
Sign: 4b5ece1e114386f6a105425ef799091475b249eb
BundleMon
Files updated (2)
Status | Path | Size | Limits |
---|---|---|---|
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/main.(hash).js |
386.08KB (+1.42KB +0.37%) | +10% |
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/runtime.(hash).js |
40.75KB (+105B +0.25%) | +10% |
Unchanged files (3)
Status | Path | Size | Limits |
---|---|---|---|
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/vendor.(hash).js |
213.01KB | +10% |
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/polyfills.(hash).js |
11.25KB | +10% |
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/styles.(hash).css |
1.39KB | +10% |
Total files change +1.52KB +0.23%
Groups updated (1)
Status | Path | Size | Limits |
---|---|---|---|
:white_check_mark: | demo/browser/*. |
2.37MB (+10.86KB +0.45%) | - |
Final result: :white_check_mark:
View report in BundleMon website ➡️
I think that's excessive. Can we just add rel="noreferrer noopener"
there? What's the potential downside?