Tab Atkins Jr.

I think you're asking if superellipses support an elliptical corner (different absolute lengths for x and y radius)? If so, yes, it's a super*ellipse* after all. ^_^

I think it would have been good to treat a document-initial (possibly preceded by a bom) `#!` as a line comment, and would, personally, be ok with still sneaking it...

Okay, thinking thru scoping @property. The big problem, which I cite in the spec, is the idea that an inheriting value can cross a boundary and suddenly be subject to...

Enhancing custom property names to a (tree scope, property name) tuple does solve some of the issues: * host element can be styled with *both* versions of the property *...

No, that's a special exception specifically for `var()` so you can substitute with an empty value (since you're allowed to *define* a custom property to have an empty value). It...

Well, none of those were specified to also have that special exception. It's fine if we do want to allow it, tho. ^_^

This sounds like a reasonable idea, tho I also don't like the name. ^_^ Do you know how Discord detects when you're streaming? It's not something that the OS itself...

It's allowed in @font-feature-values so you can apply a `font-display` even if you don't have control over the @font-face rules themselves - as mentioned, this is useful for the Google...

...oooh, that's a good idea. Hm. How about this? ``` @partial font-face { ... } ``` The `@partial` rule looks identical to a normal at-rule, just with the normal at-rule's...

> I presume that if you don't have any... Yes, that's exactly what the last example is about. > I'm not sure that the cascading behavior you described above is...