sympy
Authorship Criteria
Dear co-authors (@asmeurer, @smichr, @mattpap, @certik, @skirpichev, @mrocklin, @aktech, @scolobb, @moorepants, @leosartaj, @thilinarmtb, @flacjacket, @ellisonbg, @rpmuller, @Upabjojr, @hargup, @shivamvats, @fredrik-johansson, @fabianp, @mattcurry, @aterrel, @rouckas, @ashutoshsaboo, @isuruf, @Sumith1896, @rc, @scopatz), here are the ICMJE authorship criteria that we follow:
- Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
- Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
- Final approval of the version to be published; AND
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
I have verified that all of you satisfy 1. and 2. (and the info is easily accessible in authors.md for anyone to browse). The version to be published is 9fb21e871bcfa5d0ff3c8dfb70749e7473d5b6d3, can you all give a final approval of this version (thus satisfying 3.) and also agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved (thus satisfying 4.).
Just post a comment that you agree. If you do not agree to 3. or 4., let me know.
These people agreed to 3. and 4. below in a comment:
- [x] @asmeurer
- [x] @smichr
- [x] @mattpap
- [x] @certik
- [x] @skirpichev
- [x] @mrocklin
- [x] @aktech
- [x] @scolobb
- [x] @moorepants
- [x] @leosartaj
- [x] @thilinarmtb
- [x] @flacjacket
- [x] @ellisonbg
- [x] @rpmuller
- [x] @Upabjojr
- [x] @hargup
- [x] @shivamvats
- [x] @fredrik-johansson
- [x] @fabianp
- [x] @mattcurry
- [x] @aterrel
- [x] @rouckas
- [x] @ashutoshsaboo
- [x] @isuruf
- [x] @Sumith1896
- [x] @rc
- [x] @scopatz
Have we already submitted to PeerJ and been accepted without revisions? Or is this a request for what version will be submitted to PeerJ?
I approve the version and agree to 4.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, 17:59 Sergiu Ivanov [email protected] wrote:
I approve the version and agree to 4.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sympy/sympy-paper/issues/195#issuecomment-226041255, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AApkheZGJxDOEnG1nqjuNirSdiKpBlxLks5qLzIzgaJpZM4I1wuC .
@moorepants we submitted to PeerJ together with SIAM, but we didn't get an agreement with each co-author about 3. and 4. These are our authorship criteria, it's up to us when we do it. Now is a good time to do it, since the revision above is our final version, that we will submit to PeerJ.
I approve the version and agree to 4.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, 10:30 AM Sartaj Singh [email protected] wrote:
I approve the version and agree to 4.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sympy/sympy-paper/issues/195#issuecomment-226088323, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AFYuRV_qtBPjKnhB7yi067mGsFGxibWsks5qL4bogaJpZM4I1wuC .
I approve the version and agree to 4 On Jun 15, 2016 7:59 AM, "Isuru Fernando" [email protected] wrote:
I approve the version and agree to 4.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sympy/sympy-paper/issues/195#issuecomment-226095403, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAQ8h2V7GkvtG4vCUB6FwjKrmkI8QIlDks5qL5SpgaJpZM4I1wuC .
I approve the version and agree to 4.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:00 PM Sartaj Singh [email protected] wrote:
I approve the version and agree to 4.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sympy/sympy-paper/issues/195#issuecomment-226088323, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAchsgxdisotaRcfnlt3Bc6CHbcHk7F5ks5qL4bpgaJpZM4I1wuC .
@skirpichev wrote me in private email:
Yeah, I approve this version and agree to 4.
Feel free to quote me in that thread.
Approve (3) and agree (4)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Anthony Scopatz [email protected] wrote:
explicitly, yes
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sympy/sympy-paper/issues/195#issuecomment-226528994, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AASszFsGA2de5Jo94eYzr6rBf05FuGoIks5qMXGBgaJpZM4I1wuC .
