S.Y. Lee

The documentation should be improved there though, because I haven't got any basic things there get working. Usually, the object oriented programs with mutable states are not easy to execute...

This should be very careful to check if the return types were actually python singleton objects like `bool` or `None`, or sympy types that are equal to them by values...

I think that it prints in non-trivial way for LaTeX, as same as other integral transforms About printing like `Y(s)`, there can be some questions like, what if the undefined...

This is garbage-in garbage-out situation, and We already allow defining `Symbol('0'), Symbol('1')` so even if we try to raise errors for this, we need to think of other cases for...

I think that laplace transform could be first moved to separate file because it looks very large to add more stuff to transforms.py

I'm doing that changes in #24563

I'm doing some work to clean up the laplace transform table for in #24567 for redundant entries `dco`. You'd also take a look at it

Okay, I hope to see if things are nontrivial in inverse transforms. But I'd think of structuring things differently if it already shares stuff too much common.

> Personally I would like to enforce something like E501 though. Broadly I think it's good to be able to sometimes have a longer line and that this is something...

It should be good to review any functional difference of ruff than flake8 https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff#how-does-ruff-compare-to-flake8 It only says about the limitations, but I don't think that they are relevant for now...