syadnom

What would be great is to extract the latency details (direct blow at preseem's measurements) to see TCP stats for customers. throughput per site, per AP, per customer, per customer...

wha?!?!?!?! dude, this is incredible.

my other comment brought this to mind. having throughput broken out into sites and APs would be fantastic If we're overselling the peak speeds out, what matters to us is...

since you're using influx, you could just put the AP name as an attribute so it could be grouped by in grafana.

excuse me... SITE NAME...

ipv6 is basically a requirement for me. I'm not ready to commit (because I'm still on preseem and haven't made a hard decision to leave them) but if v1.1 could...

> Idea: I can adapt v1.2-alpha to have an XDP_multicore on/off toggle boolean. If False, it could use a regular one-CPU-core HTB structure with parent nodes within that, allowing IPv6...

might I suggest a vendor agnostic approach here which is simply a target IP address per site and a trace route to discover topology. maybe snmp walk each site router...

> That would build out a network topology of site-to-edge data and it would be dynamic. You could ping each of these targe not entirely sure how this has anything...

yeah, so I see the heirarchy you're building here. So does the explicit setting of download/upload per child there mean an explicit assignment of bandwidth? ie, if I have a...