Stewart X Addison

That makes sense, but your scripts do not seem consistent with that - they are trying to use JDK19 to build JDK20 on aarch64, not JDK21 on arm32. Are you...

On another note, I'd be very interested in knowing what you plan to use Arm32 JDK21 for - if you're able to willing to a add a comment into https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/962#issuecomment-1833339277...

I'm about to go on vacation until June so I won't be able to provide any more advice, but I'm not sure what to suggest. if you are able to...

Noting that this does NOT include updates for what we're going to do relating to [tags for dry-run builds](https://github.com/adoptium/temurin/issues/28#issuecomment-2041364554) which will be covered later once further discussions have occurred.

I'll hold off on merging this for a while in case others want to look over the contents

Running with `--with-devkit` [didn't work](https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk8u/job/jdk8u-linux-aarch64-temurin/447/console) via jenkins as it objected to not being able to find freetype: `configure: error: Could not find freetype! You might be able to fix this...

OK GCC 10.3 works ok, 11.2 does not. I've tried with an 11.3 build and that has the same issues as 11.2: `/home/sxa/temurin-build/build-farm/workspace/build/src/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/type.cpp:2556:71: error: 'this' pointer is null [-Werror=nonnull]`

With GCC13.2 I get this: `/home/sxa/temurin-build/build-farm/workspace/build/src/hotspot/src/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/vm/orderAccess_linux_aarch64.inline.hpp:78:28: error: 'long unsigned int __atomic_load_8(const volatile void*, int)' writing 8 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]` Noting that by...

Close is dependent on the other pr being approved and merged. The rebase is not required now but is suggested as part of a recent undocumented change to the workflows...

Maybe we don't need the [reset counter](https://github.com/adoptium/temurin-build/pull/3744) in this case but that's a minor point :-) Running some tests just now and will look through the code while I'm doing...