Stewart X Addison

Yep, whether it's with "official" options (0bviously preferred if we can) or just something we knock up ourselves to do a basic install and `java -version` we should get something...

It shouldn't be using `dockerBuild` as that's exclusively for hosts configured to run the dynamically generated docker images we use for building the JDK. `docker` should be a suitable one...

@karianna OP is correct, those paths do not exist. For now I would recommend explicitly pointing the repository file at `8` in both cases to be able to download with...

I'm not sure we can easily document this as we are at the mercy of whatever JFrog has and they may change the server names that they use, so it...

We have Alpine builds for x86-64 ~~and aarch64~~ but not other Alpine architectures, so we would have to build for that platform before we could consider producing docker files for...

@mrdziuban Yep sorry for the confusion - have done a strikethrough on aarch64 in my earlier comment. We don't currently have the testing infrasdtructure set up to do Alpine on...

Those options are different between 8 and 11+ IIRC. My suspicion would be that our conditionals are set wrongly for JDK9 and pick up the 11 way instead of 8...

Update: Note that at the moment JDK11u buids for Alpine/aarch64 are unstable so we've switched off the nightlies on those for now. Other releases have been left in but have...

> Hi @sxa, any further updates re timelines for this ticket We need to get it to a state where it fully passes the AQA tests. We've got some versions...

Wow there's a question I didn't expect! The project does not have any Itanium hardware, now any easy way to obtain it. In principle I would expect that it wouldn't...