Stewart X Addison

> Test pipelines support pushing to artifactory, so for slightly longer term storage, I would envision going that route. Yeah that's an option longer term but I wasn't envisaging us...

Some Linux/x64 timings from normal, fastdebug and slowdebug builds of jdk25u with two runs each - the first population a ccache and the second using that cache: ``` [sxa@2c6bf7e072a3 build-farm]$...

With the above PR in I've been able to run a test with jdk8u on a PR branch I had kicking around on some of the platforms: - https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/trestle-openjdk8-pipeline/3/ ✅...

Based on the above success with jdk8 (Noting that at the time of writing [jdk25u](https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/6708#issuecomment-3488233375) and [jdk26](https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/6745) have separate issues preventing the openjdk tests from running) I have created the...

I've been investigating options for allowing us to test at least one 32-bit platform (Noting that Temurin itself does not support, and does not plan to support, any 32-bit platforms...

Looking at [a test run of this](https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk8u/job/sxa-sehrish-solaris/8/console) and it's possible that the Solaris build is currently broken although it's in the freetype section so may have been a result of...

Solaris issue should be fixed by https://github.com/adoptium/temurin-build/pull/4342 so we can aim to get that one in, rebase this PR on top of it, and then run the test again.

@judovana Hmmm it's [not linking properly on Solaris](https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk8u/job/sxa-sehrish-solaris/11/console) :'( Looks like it's not correctly pulling in the C libraries when linking the built freetype: ``` Undefined first referenced symbol in...

I had a quick try and patching in `-lc` to the [Awt2dLibraries.gmk](https://github.com/adoptium/jdk8u/blob/48a9edf6301246c52fc5f770a644dec70d36c8df/jdk/make/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk#L880) file but that didn't have the desired result (Different build failure). I'm testing with `--skip-freetype` and we'll see...

> I'm testing with `--skip-freetype` and we'll see if it goes through ok. If so we can stick with that for now if the system freetype isn't too old ......