Stewart X Addison

Build issue has been flagged in the #build slack channel. License headers are a bit odd since `simplepipe.groovy` has the same header as in some of the ones in ci-jenkins-pipelines...

Changes needed to support running the scripts from this branch: ### simplepipe - Add `ARCHITECTURE` parameter - Run pipeline from SCM: `github.com/sxa/temurin-build` `solaris_simple` branch with scriptPath `sbin/solaris/simplepipe.groovy` instead of inlined...

> > Build issue has been flagged in the #build slack channel. License headers are a bit odd since `simplepipe.groovy` has the same header as in some of the ones...

I think I've got all the modifications to both x64 and sparcv9 pipelines working. Final runs are at: - https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk8u/job/jdk8u-solaris-sparcv9-temurin-simplepipe/74/ - https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk8u/job/jdk8u-solaris-x64-temurin-simplepipe/163/ _(noting that once merged, these jobs will have...

Clicking the update branch button as an easy way of re-triggering the checks (I do not expect the license one to have resolved itself though)

@bahamat Can you confirm if 22.4.0 has a build of OpenJDK17 and not just 11? I know there are third party patches to OpenJDK which will allow it to build...

Just to clarify, what is the reason for choosing to investigate this? It's not clear from the description. Presumably there is some benefit that is perceived in having an alternate...

Thanks for the clarifications @vvalderrv! Over&reliance on a single vendor is something that always makes me a bit nervous although I appreciate that GitHub is likely a fast lower risk...

Related: Upgrade the OS on the vagrant host: https://github.com/adoptium/infrastructure/issues/3589

@steelhead31 I guess this is probably done now that the VPC server has been upgraded?