Steve Winslow

+1 to add. I don't have a particular preference for the identifier either, but I do note that it appears that it has been used by David Muir Sharnoff for...

+1 to handling this via markup in BSD-3-Clause rather than adding a new separate identifier. As far as how to do that, here's the current bit of markup from [BSD-3-Clause.xml](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/b0ef20deda196ed294d15332deef26ceaa12f336/src/BSD-3-Clause.xml#L37-L38):...

+1 to add. As noted above, easily meets the "open source-ish" prong of the license inclusion principles, and inclusion in Debian and Fedora meets requirement of broad usage. I note...

+1 to add. I do think it warrants having a separate identifier from `IJG`, given the additional language noted above. I think that's substantively different enough that adding markup for...

Sorry, my comments above were unclear. The license being proposed in this issue does NOT have the "you ought to acknowledge us" language; that's the additional language in the [existing...

@jlovejoy Agreed. I think _maybe_ it would work with the following, adding the third match option below: `` I'm +1 to make this change, and sounds like @jlovejoy is too....

+1 to add. This is a simple, permissive FOSS license, with substantial use given the inclusion in Fedora. It does not match the existing [`MIT-CMU`](https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT-CMU.html) license. Purely as FYI, I...

# License Inclusion Decision ## Decision: - [X] approved - [ ] not approved ## License full name CMU Mach License ## Short ID CMU-Mach ## XML markup None at...

So... maybe I'm misunderstanding, as I'm not sure I fully understand how the MPL-2.0 is expected to be used. But I guess my assumption has been: * The text of...

Thanks @jlovejoy! Then I guess I have two questions / thoughts: 1. For the markup in [MPL-2.0](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/5cf3214a8d73ee3be9e063685b770f3ffb2950a4/src/MPL-2.0.xml#L457) and [MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/5cf3214a8d73ee3be9e063685b770f3ffb2950a4/src/MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception.xml#L458), should we remove that outer `` tag around the exhibits? Given...