fix(common): use valueFormatting if given to CountUpDirective

[AndersTornkvist]

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

• [x] Bugfix
• [ ] Feature
• [ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• [ ] Build related changes
• [ ] CI related changes
• [ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here) [valueFormatting] is not used in CountUpDirective ([ngx-charts-count-up]) if argument is given after [countTo]. Issues such as https://github.com/swimlane/ngx-charts/issues/1514 reported.

What is the new behavior? [valueFormatting] is used.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

• [ ] Yes
• [x] No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:

[ilejohn-official]

Please can you make valueFormatting take html entries and render html entities instead of just text?

[Hypercubed]

Please can you make valueFormatting take html entries and render htlm entities instead of just text?

If that becomes a feature it will use templates and not HTML strings.

[ilejohn-official]

@Hypercubed Thanks for the quick response. That's fine too. I'm trying to render an svg with a tooltip plus make the units value bold and also add some small text at the center of ngx-charts-gauge since valueFormatting isn't available in pie-grid but I see it can only accept strings and auto sizes them.

before the feature comes up, any work around on this?

[Hypercubed]

@Hypercubed Thanks for the quick response. That's fine too. I'm trying to render an svg with a tooltip plus make the units value bold and also add some small text at the center of ngx-charts-gauge since valueFormatting isn't available in pie-grid but I see it can only accept strings and auto sizes them.

before the feature comes up, any work around on this?

No work in progress that I know of. But as you can see we are very far behind on reviewing PRs. Sorry.