Swanand Mulay

Hey @piaoger , support for shared subscriptions is planned and will be supported soon. Will be closing this issue in favor of #621 , you can track the progress there.

> Hi, I would also need this functionality. Is there any progress on this topic? > Hey @dlips , there was some _progress_, I created a PoC https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt/compare/main...pkid-poc for an...

Hey, I was just checking out older issues, and stumbled on this. rumqttc v0.23.0 onwards, we can set _request modifier_ function using: ( added in #642 ) https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt/blob/5748d451d485bda7fd84e0c983ade793b3fda87b/rumqttc/src/lib.rs#L710 So modifying...

Hey, update on the progess: - rumqttc now [supports](https://bytebeam.io/blog/rumqttc-now-supports-mqtt5-3/) MQTTv5! - rumqttd supporting MQTTv5 is WIP and making progress rapidly. You can track the progress here: #621 Closing this issue...

Hey, please check if i understood this correctly: - if incoming _packet_ comes before the pending throttle ( in case if there were some _pending requests_ ), the `next_request` future...

hey @caoruijuan13 , thanks for the contribution, can you please elaborate more on why this is required?

> @flxo @swanandx I wonder what's stopping us from going further now? same changes needs to be done for v5 client as well. And i think the discussion about what...

> The v5 client is already supported because v5 MqttOptions NetworkOptions references the already implemented lib NetworkOptions, doesn't it? > that is `bind_device` which is different from `bind_addr` right? if...

> it's just to give users an idea of what is possible, they can choose to not go the route we illustrate, but we can try and educate them about...

Hey, it looks like the ca-cert's version isn't supported by rustls ( maybe it's X509 older versions? ). Can you try with older version of rumqttc as well as latest...