svrolanski
Results
3
comments of
svrolanski
yes, that is a valid wordaround for it, I think that was what I used, but it is will a bug isn't?
After some quick reading, it does not seem to break any RFC and I agree with what one said: "The difference between /user/john and /?user=john is merely a semantic one"....
Fixed the issue by changing the webservice to return an empty string. Still, I think DavidWebb should handle http code 204 correctly.