Stefano Vozza

Closing due to inactivity.

Yep, I agree. Is the name `using` OK given its similarity to `use`, which we use for a completely different purpose?

I realise this is one of the issues that's holding up 3.0.0 and I have time to start tomorrow but I'm not really sure where to start with the `using`...

Thanks @vqvu . I'll probably try to keep it simple initially and implement the first one. I should get to this tonight.

Just so I'm sure I'm on the right track, when I add something like this onto, say, `sequence` then I get the expected behaviour: ``` js .onDestroy(function() { self.destroy(); if...

Yeah, I get you. I just threw that together as a test really. So I've got an interesting case here with `parallel`. If I create a destructor function like this:...

Yep, that stopped there error but the second generator is still getting consumed.

Yeah, my generators are basically exactly the same as that except the `setTimeout` value is set to `10`. I guess I'll need a different `onDestroy` test for `parallel` and `merge`...

Yep, I think this is a great idea. I also know I'm one of the people holding it up because of #412. I kind of got stuck on that one...

I don't think they do the same thing, they have different type signatures: ``` haskell through :: (Stream a -> Stream b) -> Stream a -> Stream b map ::...