blst
                                
                                
                                
                                    blst copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        better no_std support
- use core/alloc instead of 
std 
Just in case, I'd be hesitant to go "all-in" for no_std. If we go there, it would be more than appropriate to have it as a compile-time option. I assume that this is about embedded systems, so we're looking specifically at the most basic functionality, right? With no_std being an option it would be possible to mask some of the advanced functionality that would be in the way.
Just in case, I'd be hesitant to go "all-in" for no_std. If we go there, it would be more than appropriate to have it as a compile-time option.
yes, I plan to use feature flag to turn on/off no_std instead of enforcing #![no_std]. was occupied by other work, will continue later.
Standard feature flag-based solution in #150
There is #153 in works.