Dave Clarke

Good idea. As far as I'm aware, we support only arrays. We should support lists and sets, and (hash)maps/tables. And, these should be compatible with Party types and bigvars (which...

Now that there are standard libraries (in existing PR) for hashmaps, sets, and lists (mutable, oo style), perhaps this could be rediscussed. A very simple approach is as follows: ```...

Nothing deep, but this seems analogous to the idea of running different method invocations of an active object concurrently (on different cores). If the methods are proven to not interfere,...

It looks like it could be the same error. Perhaps merging this issue with the previous.

Will be fixed when relevant Pony stuff is exploited by compiler.

Could `Actor` be called `Runner` or something else to avoid confusion with actors (which we call active classes).

`Monad`.

`Hash` has been introduced, calls `Hashable` in `Hash.Hashable`.

The first local function I write broke this simplifying rule. Grrrnang.

What makes this even more annoying is that the local function cannot even access `this`.