Sergei Lebedev

**Update**: compiler error is documented [here](http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual021.html): > There are a number of restrictions: [...] the definition must be either another type constructor (with _identical type parameters_).

I've tried to generalize distribution signatures, so now each distribution also has an `elt` type. However, I'm unsure what to do with remaining signatures. For instance, `Mean`: ``` ocaml module...

Actually, what do you think about switching to objects for distributions? that way can get rid of all of the micro-signatures, like `Mean`, `Variance` etc, because we have row polymorphism...

Okay, I've chosen to stick with modules for now, multivariate normal distribution can be expressed as: ``` ocaml module MultiNormal : sig type elt = float array include BaseDistribution with...

Well, for SciPy a list of supported distributions is a little [longer](http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/stats.html), but still, all of them are univariate.

Thanks for the bug report! I'm not actively looking after pareto these days and will happily accept a PR fixing that.

Possible less-powerful alternative is [Anderson-Darling test](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson%E2%80%93Darling_test).

Well, io does allow newlines in the syntax, it was the interpreter aka REPL which was the problem. Anyway, I guess this might've changed throughout the years. Can you possibly...

Any hints on how this might be implemented? I was thinking something like the following might work: ``` bash $ cat foo.peg foo

JFYI I would very much like something more emacs-like.