suketa
suketa
@coderabbitai Thank you! But I've already tried the code you are suggesting before, and I got the same error... Should we take a break and refresh?
@rlancer I have not figure out the detail about these items. - Ruby array should be converted duckdb array type or duckdb list type, which is better? - How to...
@otegami Thank you!!! Yes, please.
@otegami I have not decided what kind of API is enough or better yet, but I think ruby interface should be thin wrapper of duckdb_logical_column_type. duckdb_column_logical_type definition is the following:...
memo: Should `DuckDB::LogicalType.new(1)` return `DuckDB::LogicalType` object representing boolean type by using duckdb_create_logical_type ?
@otegami > I would like to proceed with implementing the DuckDB::LogicalType wrapper step by step as outlined below: Thank you, go ahead :+1:
@otegami Thank you for your suggestion. I agree with you. > Could you share your thoughts on implementing bindings for the duckdb_create_* functions? I'm not sure but I think we...
#940 is created and close this issue.
It is duckdb's issue https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/13872 Fixed by https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/13891.
currently ruby-duckdb drop duckdb 1.1.0. So this issue is closed now.