Hirotaka Suetake

Hi, I'm also very interested in this PR. > I think of workflow params as inputs + engine specific parameters -- and those can vary quite a bit between different...

I have not yet been able to address the comment discussed in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-utils/issues/273#issuecomment-1890921004.

@alexiswl > Mind if I put in a PR into this script? Of course, thank you. I have granted you access to https://github.com/suecharo/cwl-utils. (Is this the correct way to do...

@alexiswl Thank you for your advice. > Rather than PR from main on your remote, I'd recommend making a branch on your repo and putting the PR in from that....

@alexiswl Thank you. I have confirmed that commits have been cherry-picked in PR #288 . So, it's ok to close this PR. P.S., I'm looking forward to the CWL conference!

Thank you for your comment. I somewhat understand that the inputs object is a cwl.InputParameter. However, considering the load_document_by_uri interface, which is defined as follows: ```python def load_document_by_uri( path: Union[str,...

Thank you, @uniqueg . > I think there is some push in the Cloud Work Stream to keep the APIs as lightweight as possible. Indeed, as Manabu mentioned, this direction...

Thank you, Mr. @mr-c . Should I create the PR? (Tazro seems to want this fix done sooner rather than later.)

## My Environment - OS: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) - Python: 3.10.12 ## Steps to Reproduce Run the following command: ```bash $ docker run -it --rm -v "$PWD":"$PWD" -w="$PWD"...

@mr-c , In summary, the error I encountered seems likely to be resolved by updating the cwltool container. However, upon further debugging, I noticed that the requests library isn't fetching...