Lightweightness vs Setup Complexity

[mxstbr]

Based on a discussion in https://github.com/styled-components/comparison/pull/31#issuecomment-249354822, I think we might need to rename the lightweightness category. In the comparison repo I changed the Checklist for the different methods to be this:

- ✅ No build requirements
- 😕 Small and lightweight
- ✅ Supports global CSS
- ✅ Supports entirety of CSS
- ✅ Colocated
- ✅ Isolated
- ✅ Doesn’t break inline styles
- 😕 Easy to override
- ❌ Theming
- ❌ Pre-build
- ✅ Server side rendering
- ❌ No wrapper components

_{Legend: ✅ = Yes, ❌ = No, 😕 = Kinda, refer to notes or parentheses}

But I think what we really want to say with lightweightness is setup complexity. None of the current methods is anywhere near "too big" imo.

/cc @kof

[kof]

I would consider size in kb only if there are big differences between the libs, otherwise category would be "Setup complexity".

Also I am not sure if setup complexity varies that much or matter that much, because it is done just once.

Another point could be "Usage simplicity."