Stas Sergeev

@slurps-mad-rips OK, got it to URL. :) https://godbolt.org/z/T6rPYa So what do you think? Btw, I assume you are subscribed to that thread, so I don't need to always mention you....

@slurps-mad-rips ping. :) There are few possibilities here: 1. your proposal can work with my test-case, and the only thing needed is to show how exactly 2. your proposal does...

> Regarding your previous message it looks like they fixed the memcpy compile time that used to work. In what gcc? On godbolt I wasn't able to find any gcc...

> However, after a discussion in both SG7 and LEWG (the notes of which require > password access that I am not at liberty to give), we did realize it...

Which would mean a gcc compatibility hopefully. But its quite a big rework. Whether or not the gcc compatibility worth the trouble, is an open question. And when this is...

As became obvious from the failed #166 attempt, such wrappers should be squashed into AsmXXX classes.

I don't prefer 4 here because, unlike in dosemu2, where old builds reduce both security and functionality, here nothing is changed at all. So such separation here makes much less...

I reverted to objcopy to get at least Bionic back. But I still think its time to get configure, as too many build-time uncertainty have accumulated.

I think you see the automatic line-wrapping laying on top of the manual ones. I am trying to keep the lines short to avoid automatic wraps from ever happening, but...

One idea was to create wrappers with automatic storage, and memcpy() the data back and forth. Tried patch c9f76e33d but it fails to compile with ``` blockio.cc:396:23: error: expression is...