William Easton
William Easton
I think we're also missing some useful common fields like device name
Sounds good, I can include this in one of my PRs coming up!
hass.entity.object.id? or object_id?
@cmacknz added additional tests
proposed PR https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709
Yes this can be closed now in favor of the issue @pierrehilbert referenced
Related to https://github.com/elastic/beats/issues/39706 and https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709
@faec can we make sure these items are fixed in your refactor as well? i.e. the ones in https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709 that arent already fixed?
this was not supposed to merge, it was just an example for how to include it post s3/sqs refactor, ill close the PR