William Easton

Results 215 comments of William Easton

I think we're also missing some useful common fields like device name

Sounds good, I can include this in one of my PRs coming up!

hass.entity.object.id? or object_id?

proposed PR https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709

Yes this can be closed now in favor of the issue @pierrehilbert referenced

Related to https://github.com/elastic/beats/issues/39706 and https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709

@faec can we make sure these items are fixed in your refactor as well? i.e. the ones in https://github.com/elastic/beats/pull/39709 that arent already fixed?

this was not supposed to merge, it was just an example for how to include it post s3/sqs refactor, ill close the PR