William Easton
William Easton
Okay -- pushed the update. Would you be able to try again? also feel free to reply with any issues on the PR
I'm a big fan of "Agents as Tools" with "Tools" being Tools on an MCP server -- and i have been working on making it easier to expose Agents in...
I was really hoping I could just install an old version of the extension to use with a ruby project or set the `branch` setting to run the old version...
> [@strawgate](https://github.com/strawgate) that's because the Ruby LSP's executable has two modes of operation. It is first used to compose the special bundle under `.ruby-lsp` without `bundle exec` and then running...
/marvin let's offer both in the bulk tool caller
/marvin im not sure i want a custom validator and serializer on the fastmcp component, we might just need to use custom cachable models in the response caching middleware, can...
/marvin do you think we could just remove key and just mutate the tool name when it gets returned from mounted servers?
/marvin im not sure that's convincing, for a client to call a tool we must be able to distinguish prefixes without keys already? Can you review this again? What if...
/marvin remove key and fix merge conflicts and respond to jlowin
@claude but wouldnt we just model_copy the tool? then changing the name wouldnt change the tool in the underlying tool manager? Or return a transformed tool where the name has...