hannah

closed since #24020 went in, but I'm a little iffy if the co-authoring was done properly. Thank you @Kinza-Raza for all the work you did on this!

Is my fault for not aggressively flagging it, but I think we can amend the commit if we get the right name/email combo @QuLogic?

B/c @Kinza-Raza avatar isn't showing up as a co-author so I think that means it's not linking to her account.

I use a dictionary of {'thing w/ this color':'color'} so I'm sympathetic, and I think it would be in line w/ registering colormaps and registering color sequences. Is it unfeasible...

> so there is no risk of name conflicts with other color names Same, my use case is [math augmentation](https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491102.3501932) so I'm color coding concepts in equations and figures and...

There's work to do to make sure all the 3.7 PRs get labeled and there's a question about going back (possibly a sprint task?) but I think this is done...

Marked as ready was my mistake while looking for a lable. I think this could be a worthwhile approach, but if it's major should probably get sign off from @rougier

Somewhere on the cheatsheet it's mentioned that plot is a better option for very specific types of scatter situations and I think it's OK to leave this as general case...

> scatter is for when you need a third dimension, either represented as marker size or color. Otherwise, you should just use plot. for smaller datasets the difference is negligible...

Um, I have a suggestion for maybe a good first issue version of sorting through the rc params, which is maybe take @mwaskom's suggestion of moving the documentation of the...