Stanislav Terliakov

> The PEP hasn't been accepted yet. I recommend you join the discussion at https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-695-type-parameter-syntax/21646 if you feel strongly on the topic :) I don't think that my aesthetic preferences...

> I'd suggest expanding it so it is not limited to constructors. I revisited this issue once again, here's one case related to example you show, which should **not** be...

I'm currently solving this with [`pytest-subtests`](https://pypi.org/project/pytest-subtests/), grouping similar tests into one function with several `subtests.test` groups. This works well, but leads to long and hardly readable test methods. The suggestion...