Stephan Boyer

I agree that it would be nice for Docuum to clean up more than just images. This is a common feature request (e.g., https://github.com/stepchowfun/docuum/issues/68), and I don't have any major...

Ah, looks like that was from https://github.com/stepchowfun/docuum/pull/341, intended to fix https://github.com/stepchowfun/docuum/issues/237 (workaround for a Docker bug). We could revert that PR, but it would bring back the original Docker issue....

> My naive suggestion to fix the problem is ignoring the "container doesn't exist" error from docker in case inspection fails. I agree with this! The only complication is that...

Additional commentary on previous message: > add some retry logic that splits up the problematic batch or attempts each container individually. Ideally we'd do the former (e.g., splitting the failing...

That sounds reasonable to me! I'd be happy to review a PR if anyone can contribute it.

Unfortunately we tried this in the past, shipped it, and subsequently had to revert it: https://github.com/stepchowfun/docuum/pull/100 So I'm concerned that we'll run into issues again with `bollard`. Even though I...

> We're already using our own fork of Docuum, we can keep using it. If you don't mind me asking, what are the other differences between your fork and upstream?...

Thanks for explaining! There's another thing I want to keep in mind about this change: some people are using Docuum with [Podman](https://podman.io/) instead of Docker. Unfortunately the most recent Docuum...

Integrating into tonic seems worthwhile! But I'm not sure what it would take exactly. Does tonic allow prost to be swapped with something else? BTW, if you want to prototype...

That's an interesting callout. If you need a workaround today, you could store fixed-width integers as `Bytes`, but it would be at the expense of ergonomics.