Stefan Rueger
Stefan Rueger
Good question! Originally `-E` was implemented for parallel programmers (remember the parallel port for printers from the last millennium?). Only a couple of other programmers followed suit. Looking at the...
@MCUdude Were you volunteering to implement `-E` for usbasp? If not I'd close this issue.
> I thought that this will remain open now that I'm working on it . @dioannidis Ooops! That was an auto-close when merging a PR (this issue was linked to...
> So I'd assume that eventually broke AVRdoper back then. Anything that can be done? @mcuee @MCUdude
@mcuee Just checking whether this PR is still a draft despite recent commits last week
@mcuee Thanks for proactively starting issues on things we'd like improved. Can we please use fewer issues: we can summarise what needs improved, eg, have *one* issue for improving autotools...
@mcuee Brilliant, thank you!
There are subtle but important differences between programmer, part and memory names: - Programmer names are arbitrary product names, sometimes modified by the AVRDUDE project; it makes sense to get...
> Avrdude supports m328p, t817 and x128a1u. Would it be possible to implement support for 128da32 as well? As in PR #1703?
@MCUdude I won't be attempting to extend Damerau-Levenshtein to parts, mainly because I think that's waaay too complex a task with too little benefit. The asymmetry between parts and programmers...