Elliot Saba

My first guess is that it might be a bug due to the `/` in my branch name.

BatchNorm is going to be tricky because of its "statistics update step". The current thinking behind this with Zygote is to do something along the lines of https://gist.github.com/staticfloat/a509b1e1cb1fb556028779722c2531e6

I can't reproduce this locally with Julia 1.7, 1.8-beta3 or latest `master`. Can you?

I'm still not 100% certain this is the wrong behavior. It depends on what `Pkg.add()` means. From a manifest standpoint, this is the correct behavior. If you were on Julia...

As an example of how this gets worked around in BinaryBuilder: ```julia using Pkg, BinaryBuilderBase verbose = true dependencies = [PackageSpec(;name="GMP_jll")] julia_version = v"1.6" ctx = Pkg.Types.Context(;julia_version) Pkg.API.handle_package_input!.(dependencies) Pkg.add(ctx, dependencies)...

Cool @arhik! To make it easier for you, I just merged #142 so that you can more easily rebase. Here are my thoughts: * We don't need to call this...

Hmmm.... I'm not sure we're ever going to be compiling with MSVC, since BB is all built on top of Linux, and MSVC doesn't work there. ;) On the other...

I've started the process here: https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Gtk.jl/pull/619 I've also simplified some other things; once we can verify that this simplified process works, let's take a second look at whether this fixes...

@tknopp what do you think about bumping the minimum required version to 1.6? That's best for `Scratch` usage anyway, since that's the point at which `Pkg.gc()` knows how to clean...

I don't really know what to do here; I guess whatever bot is running the registration needs to be running Julia 1.6?