Jason Staten
Jason Staten
That would be a good place for it. Then you could add the exact set of HTTP headers
@Minicriss could you see how this performs for you? https://github.com/statianzo/Fleck/pull/210
> I implemented it so that it doesn't alter the current behavior without explicitly specifying it, this way, people can simply update without worrying. I'll release it as a major...
> I know I'm pretty late here, but I would rather using a `BlockingCollection` than throwing away the messages in this case. That would allow slow clients to use up...
If anyone can give a PR that does signing during the Appveyor build, I'm fine with bringing it in.
That line is from a client requesting an unsupported version of Websockets. (Maybe 75?) https://github.com/statianzo/Fleck/blob/a7cd8ec6565fd4486cbcd4f5264aaf44801c64f6/src/Fleck/HandlerFactory.cs#L8-L25
It's one of the first implemented drafts of the websocket spec. Really out of date. If you implement a handler, send a pull request over.
Yes. Flash should be `policy-file-request`
To clarify, Flash will be `policy-file-request` upon initial connection. Flash will then reconnect using one of the numeric protocols.
Build a `IHandler` implementation that supports 75 and add it to the HandlerFactory. The draft is available at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-75