stash-box
stash-box copied to clipboard
[Feature] Set Organised Status
There is currently a status for scenes (and galleries) in Stash to set a scene to "Organised". This is currently unused and requires a user manually toggle it for scenes.
What I'd like to propose is that these be added to Stash-box as well for when we are 100% sure a scene requires no more further updates. Then when a user matches their scene, they gain the organised toggle as well.
I imagine some people may not like this, as is the case with any change for anything, so this could possibly be implemented as a toggle on the Stash side.
NO.
this will cause confusion more than anything else. it is UP TO YOU to set the organized flag and not to the community. Why? 1- each of us have different definition of what organized really mean 2- I use the organized flag after I personally review the scene 3- No.
NO.
this will cause confusion more than anything else. it is UP TO YOU to set the organized flag and not to the community. Why? 1- each of us have different definition of what organized really mean 2- I use the organized flag after I personally review the scene 3- No.
You've clearly misunderstood or are just ignoring my comments.
- Okay? This isn't subjective but to each their own, I guess. Organised means organised.
- That's what tags are for, but again, to each their own.
- Yes.
If you don't want to receive the organised status from stash-box, then don't. I'm proposing a toggle. The exact same toggle that's already available for setting male performers, setting cover images, and setting tags. If you don't want it, turn it off.
As much as I'd want this to be opt-out, it would have to be opt-in, meaning this isn't going to effect you unless you want it to.
I would welcome the option to automatically set the 'organised' flag based on if a scene has been matched to one via Stash-box. I see no issue as long as it was a toggle that was off by default.
Perhaps not Organized per say, but I have thought that some kind of indication of even a lock to prevent certain modifications would be a good idea. Crowd sourcing the base dataset is great, though at some point a scene should be marked as unable to be edited without certain circumstance.
This request is closely related to #213 which proposes the ability to "lock" individual fields. Personally, I think that approach would be more useful than setting the entire scene as "organized" since most scenes are going to be a mix of organized and organized fields anyways, so better to track which fields specifically are preventing a scene from being completely done.
That's not to say we couldn't have a scene-wide "organized" flag sit on top of that "lock" system, but I agree that not everyone would want to inherit that flag in Stash automatically. "Organized" according to your personal preferences are not the same as "organized" according to the community guidelines.
I don't hate it, but who decides if a scene is considered fully fleshed-(pun intended)-out and requires no further edits? I personally like to add relevant tags to 70-80% of the scenes that I pull down from the db, either because they have none or are missing some relevant ones. I know the organized flag doesn't preclude this, but if they are locked on the db side, it would prevent that work from being shared with others.
I'd imagine any scene-wide "organized" flag wouldn't affect tag additions. For StashDB it would need to be defined in the guidelines but the flag could just mean that all available studio-sourced tags have been scraped and added. Since we only use studio tags as a starting point, there will always be room for community additions/corrections from there.
As long as it's off by default, everyone would be happy. Nothing would change for people who don't use it or don't want it automated and it would give people who prefer to solely rely on a single stash-box instance what they want.
Though the feature request is dependent on some kind of lock mechanism to be implemented first. Maybe the one #213 mentioned by @AdultSun
.