Feature Request : Add FAQ

[A-coolcreator]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Add FAQ

Questions to address in FAQ

• Why was an alpha version released instead of directly launching the production version (referring to Starknet)?
• What is the expected TPS in the future production version, or what is the estimated maximum TPS for the L2 developed by STARKs?
• Why is the actual transaction completion time different from the estimated transaction time within the explorer?
• Is it necessary to wait for the status to become 'accepted on L1' for a transaction to be considered complete?
• Is it possible to manually increase gas fees to speed up transactions?
• Why does it take so long for withdrawals using Starkgate to be credited, and why is an Ethereum gas fee still required?

[A-coolcreator]

@stoobie can you please assign me this task i would like to work on this

[stoobie]

@A-coolcreator Sure.

Please use the following code as a template:

[id="FAQ"]
= Frequently asked questions

[id="FAQ"]

[#<question>
== <Question>

<Answer>

[hardiktheprogrammer]

@stoobie I would like to contribute to this can you please assign me

[stoobie]

@hardiktheprogrammer I think that this FAQ on the Starknet site already addresses most of the questions and we can send them more questions if there are any missing.

WDYT?

[hardiktheprogrammer]

here are some other questions 7) How can I participate in voting if I don't have tokens? 8) Why are tokens deployed on Ethereum rather than on Starknet? 9) Why is it necessary to use Cairo instead of directly using Solidity?

[stoobie]

@hardiktheprogrammer @A-coolcreator:

@hardiktheprogrammer I think that this FAQ on the Starknet site already addresses most of the questions and we can send them more questions if there are any missing.

WDYT?

As far as I can tell, the existing FAQ is enough. If you don't agree, please explain why.

[hardiktheprogrammer]

@hardiktheprogrammer @A-coolcreator:

@hardiktheprogrammer I think that this FAQ on the Starknet site already addresses most of the questions and we can send them more questions if there are any missing. WDYT?

As far as I can tell, the existing FAQ is enough. If you don't agree, please explain why.

I concur that the existing FAQ is adequate; however, integrating it into the Starknet documentation would be advantageous, allowing developers to comprehend and access all the information contained within the FAQ seamlessly through the official Starknet documentation.

but yeah I m agree with , existing FAQ is enough

[stoobie]

Closing this as we decided that it's covered in the existing FAQ.