stap-m

Why do we need the `proper part` relations? Couldn't we just add `subsector of` and `has subsector` as proper relations, without being subrelations of `has part`?

> We could introduce something similar: > * `has proper part`: _A has part relation that denotes an antisymmetric, irreflexive (normally transitive) relation between a whole and a distinct part._...

Solved by PR #1346

Can scenarios entail several "types", e.g. be as well an energy scenario and an emission scenario and a WAM scenario? Then the subclass structure might not serve, but rather something...

> For example: 'energy scenario' EquivalentTo: scenario and relation_to_be_specified some 'energy system'. Nice. `is about` or a subrelation seem suitable. `'energy scenario' EquivalentTo: scenario and 'is about' some 'energy system'`...

We have `policy`, `policy instrument` and `transformative measure`[^1] implemented. In the [background information ](https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology/issues/1329#issuecomment-1293009634) above, "policies and measures" etc. are not clearly distinct from each other. @han-f is it possible...

From a trilateral meeting with @han-f and @l-emele * `policies and measures` as alternative terms for as well `policy instrument` and `transformative measure`, maybe also for `policy` * In the...

Summary and proposals for missing concepts: - I propose `policy scenario`: _A scenario in which certain policy instruments or transformative measures and their impacts are assumed._ - equivalentTo `scenario and...

Any comments @l-emele @han-f ?

I could implement, so that we can include it into the OEKG quickly.