stap-m
stap-m
I will take a look and discuss this internally asap.
To fix the merge conflicts, I removed the "inverse of" axioms from ro-module.owl for RO_0002234 / `has output` and RO_0002352/ `input of`, since they are already moved to the new...
To me, the PR seems fine now. Since the PR contains bigger structural changes, I added you as a further reviewer @areleu. It would be great to finish this PR...
If by function you mean BFO:0000034, no.
This is open for quite a while and we have a proposal here: _A relation that holds between a continuant and another continuant it requires to function._ Any comments? Domain...
... to _work_.?
I'm closing the PR now but keep the branch for now @Ludee
> top-down vs. bottom-up (economic or technological components of the simulation), equilibrium vs. optimization vs. simulation, and intertemporal vs. sequential. We should focus on this part of the issue. With...
Since the classification of `model` was updated in #1707, I close this now.
@stage1407 did you try out the script of @sfluegel05 ?