Should <dfn> for glossary terms be annotated with xml:lang?

[apasel422]

7.11.3.3 says:

The <dt> element contains a single <dfn> element, which in turn contains the term to be defined.

If the term's language differs from that of the base document, I assume it should be annotated with an appropriate xml:lang attribute, per 5.3. If so, we likely want to update the <dfn>s in:

• Tarzan the Terrible, whose terms are annotated with xml:lang="x-pal-ul-don" throughout the text.
• Lavengro, whose terms are annotated with xml:lang="rom" or xml:lang="rme" throughout the text.

[acabal]

Correct, can you open PRs for those?

[apasel422]

Correct, can you open PRs for those?

Will do.