Kartikaya Gupta (kats)

Ah I see what you mean. That's a fair point. When I wrote it I was mostly following the spec and in the one case it's a descriptor string and...

Ok after reading over the spec again I agree with you, the way I have it is inconsistent and can be improved. What I'm thinking is that 1. The ClassName...

I think in this case the unqualified names would be returned as Strings with copying. I don't mind doing that since it would be an explicit function call from the...

Hi, thanks for the PR. I haven't had a chance to look into it yet but will get to it in the next couple of days. Sorry for the delay.

Thank you again @xitep for the PR. It's merged now, please try it out and if it satisfies your uses I can publish a new version

I've published 0.9.0 with the changes. I'll look at the performance separately and maybe publish a new patch release with perf improvements. For now I'll close this issue. Thanks!

Hi, sorry for the delay here. I don't think I'll have time in the foreseeable future to implement this but I would take a PR. Can probably reuse most of...

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I'm curious, why do you need the index of the entries in the constant pool? What kinds of operations do you need to do that...

The indexes are kind of an implementation detail given the abstraction layer this library is targeting, which is why I intentionally didn't expose them in the API. That's why I'd...

Also which reserved opcodes are you referring to?