Steffen

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, > Another take away is the number of tabs is equal to the indent level when using just `tab`. Yes, that's the idea of the entire indenting thing...

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, > The rule `whitespace_001` checks for trailing whitespace and will remove it. Ah, so it is back to life? I remember it was deprecated at some point...

Hi @BasF0, thanks for your feedback! > maybe a useful rule generally is to check on every line that every tab only follows another tab Yes, that's a great explicit...

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, > A tab shall be preceded by another tab or a new line. That might be too strict: Imagine somebody puts a table into comments and uses tabs...

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, I would personally **not** distinguish between comments and code for this question. For my perspective, tabs vs. spaces applies on an even more basic level. I think you'd...

Hi @BasF0, sure, an easy example would be a table in the comments, or some concatenation that someone tries to align via tabs: ```vhdl -- This is my documentation, see...

Hi @BasF0, I didn't test how my 2 examples actually render, I just typed them up to give you a conceptual idea. We see that more tabs here and there...

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, I'm generally OK with your proposal. In order to make it more consistent with what we've discussed earlier, could the option names for `whitespace_002` be closer to the...

Hi @jeremiah-c-leary, I would say that this would make sense. Again, as mentioned in the issue description, I'm actually not super sure to understand the difference between `sequential_004` and `concurrent_009`....

Yes, I would agree to unification here: All these are structural language elements where the same rules can apply (and should). If you can hence manage to define a base...