docs Improve docs

Review the docs and suggest improvements

Oct 01 '25 18:10 kenrogers

@claude please review the existing docs and suggest any improvements that should be made to improve the developer experience

Oct 01 '25 18:10 kenrogers

Did you perform the above request @claude ?

Oct 01 '25 18:10 kenrogers

@claude take a look at this and provide recommendations on how to improve the quickstart, if any

Oct 01 '25 19:10 kenrogers

Claude finished @kenrogers's task —— View job

Quickstart Documentation Review Complete ✅

I've completed a thorough review of the Developer Quickstart tutorial at guides-and-tutorials/hello-stacks-quickstart-tutorial.md. Overall, this is excellent documentation with clear structure, helpful examples, and great educational content. Here are my recommendations for improvement:

🎯 High-Priority Improvements

Add troubleshooting section
- The tutorial jumps straight into success paths but doesn't cover common errors
- Add a "Common Issues" section covering:
  - Wallet connection failures
  - Contract deployment errors (insufficient funds, syntax errors)
  - Network mismatch issues (testnet vs mainnet)
  - Transaction timeout/confirmation issues
  - CORS issues when running locally
Clarify the CONTRACT_ADDRESS format
- Line 340 says to replace with "YOUR_CONTRACT_ADDRESS_HERE"
- Line 656 shows it should look like ST1ABC...123.message-board
- This is confusing - the format shown includes the contract name, but the code has separate CONTRACT_ADDRESS and CONTRACT_NAME variables
- Should clarify that CONTRACT_ADDRESS should be just the address (e.g., ST1ABC...123), not including the contract name
Add expected timeframes for transactions
- Users should know how long to wait for:
  - Contract deployment (~30-60 seconds)
  - Message posting (~30 seconds)
  - When to worry something went wrong
Include prerequisites installation check
- Add a quick verification step at the beginning:
  - Check Node.js version compatibility
  - Verify npm is installed
  - Confirm browser extension support

💡 Medium-Priority Improvements

Enhance the "What you'll learn" section
- Add: "How to read from and write to the Stacks blockchain"
- Add: "Understanding testnet vs mainnet"
- This sets clearer expectations
Add visual aids
- Screenshot of Leather wallet on testnet (many users miss this step)
- Screenshot of where to find contract address in explorer
- Screenshot of the "allow mode" toggle for post conditions (mentioned at line 293 but not shown)
Improve code example accessibility
- The frontend code (327-529) is a large block with minimal explanation
- Consider breaking it into smaller chunks with explanations:
  - Wallet connection logic
  - Reading from blockchain
  - Writing to blockchain
  - State management
Add security notes
- Mention that testnet tokens have no value but warn about mainnet deployment costs
- Add note about keeping seed phrases secure (even for testnet)
- Explain post conditions more thoroughly (currently just a link at line 293)

🔧 Minor Improvements

Fix inconsistent link formatting
- Line 53: Uses relative path clarity-crash-course.md
- Line 683: Uses full URL https://docs.stacks.co/docs/clarity
- Should be consistent - prefer relative paths for internal docs
Update example transaction link
- Line 287 has an example transaction - verify it's still accessible
- Consider adding more example links (deployed contract, successful message post)
Add "Time to completion" badges
- Each step already has time estimates in headers
- Consider adding cumulative time (e.g., "Total: ~30 minutes, Steps 1-2: 15 min")
Expand "Next Steps" section
- Current next steps are good but could include:
  - Link to sBTC builder quickstart for Bitcoin integration
  - Suggest building a more complex version (edit/delete messages, likes, user profiles)
  - Link to the Clarity Crash Course mentioned earlier

📝 Content Accuracy Check

Verify external links
- leather.io (line 32)
- Stacks Testnet Faucet (line 35)
- Clarity Playground (line 57)
- All links in "Next Steps" section
- Ensure all are current and accessible
Technical accuracy
- The get-recent-messages function (lines 96-105) has a limitation - it's hardcoded to return max 5 messages using list u1 u2 u3 u4 u5
- This should be noted as a simplification for the tutorial, or better yet, explained why Clarity doesn't support dynamic lists easily

✨ Enhancement Ideas

Add a video walkthrough
- Line 31 shows docs support embedded YouTube videos
- A quick video showing the full process would help visual learners
Create a "What went wrong?" debugging guide
- Interactive flowchart: "Can't see your message? → Check these things..."
- Common error messages and their solutions
Add deployment alternatives
- Currently only shows Stacks Explorer Sandbox
- Could mention Clarinet for local development and deployment
- Hiro Platform as another option

🎓 Learning Experience Enhancements

Add "Test Your Understanding" checkpoints
- After Step 2: "Can you add a function to delete a message?"
- After Step 4: "How would you display the message author?"
- These encourage deeper engagement
Provide a complete GitHub repository
- Mention if there's a working example repo they can clone
- Useful for those who get stuck or want to compare their work
Add a "Deploy to Mainnet" bonus section
- For users who want to take it further
- Explain the differences and costs involved

Summary

The quickstart is very well written with excellent code examples and explanations. The deep dive section is particularly impressive. The main areas for improvement are:

Adding practical troubleshooting help
Clarifying potentially confusing details (contract address format, post conditions)
Including more visual aids
Expanding error handling guidance

These improvements would make an already strong tutorial even more accessible to newcomers and reduce friction points where developers commonly get stuck.

Job Run | Branch

Oct 01 '25 19:10 claude[bot]

@kenrogers Can I take up this issue?

Oct 30 '25 13:10 pheobeayo